"What are you doing?"

In inspections abroad, it is often found that the helmets worn by employees are inferior, and other labor insurance products are not qualified. After the owner of the company points out, he often hears the owner of the company saying that “we have done so for these factories”. Compared to the security risks found, the business owner said, "These factories are doing this," and no doubt it is even more ridiculous. The reason why the boss uttered his words was that, even if there was a suspicion that the law did not condemn the public in accordance with industry practice, from the perspective of routine inspections, it was indeed true that “all are doing this”.

As to why the whole industry is cutting corners and safety hazards, the reasons are actually related to the company's business philosophy and reducing costs. It is nothing more than the cost advantage of poor quality labor insurance products in comparison with formal labor insurance products, and the huge profit space formed thereby. In fact, in addition to the low price of properly equipped poor-quality labor insurance products, it can not only fulfill the rigid requirements of the relevant regulatory authorities, but also comfort the feelings of the employees, and can be counted as the welfare of the employees. All enterprises are rushing. In this sense, the purchase of regular labor insurance products is a step-by-step issue for employees, and in order to gain a foothold in the market environment where this poor-quality labor insurance product is rampant, it does not have an advantage.

However, we have experienced too much of this kind of “bad money drives out good money”. This phenomenon has also long been proved to be a fallacy in any market that lacks effective supervision. In this sense, we can all blame the unscrupulous business owners, but the rules and order of the market, relying solely on corporate consciousness and business ethics, are obviously not enough. In this sense, business owners who violate the use of inferior quality labor insurance products cannot escape the culpability, but the reason why “the whole industry is doing this” is also the need to ask market regulators for their responsibilities.

For example, for the production, use and circulation of labor insurance products, this should be strictly supervised. However, it is clearly a poor quality product. How can we disguise ourselves and put on a vest with a "qualified product"? This clearly exposed the regulatory omissions in the production and sales of labor insurance products. In addition, even if unqualified labor insurance products enter the circulation field, how can they be able to unblock the market in a smooth manner? Especially when “the whole industry is doing this”, the secret of disclosure can still become a blind spot for supervision, and I am afraid it is even more necessary to ask questions.

In a word, as long as the weaknesses and blind spots of supervision still exist, illegal behavior has become an absurd play of “industry standard” or even “new technology”, and there is still a broad arena.